Part 1: Big picture and Examples
  icon
Thema: 05: Whither a Socio-Cultural Ecology of Learning with Mobile Devices

In this chapter we attempt an overview, and critique of the dominant theoretical and conceptual frames currently used by researchers to explain and analyse learning with mobile devices. In particular, we discuss Activity Theory (Engeström) as well as, to a lesser extent, situated learning theory (Lave and Wenger), the Conversational Framework (Laurillard) and the Ecology of Resources Model (Luckin). We conclude that, whilst they are of merit, the dominant frame, Activity Theory (AT), is characterised by a number of features and weaknesses, which makes it unsuitable for our purposes.

Unterthemen:

Schlagworte:

  • 47 Publikationen (0 read)
  • 72 Autoren [betrachten]
  • Keine Unterthemen
Publikationen für Thema: 05: Whither a Socio-Cultural Ecology of Learning with Mobile Devices nach Titel sortiert

A

Sharples, Mike, Taylor, Josie und Vavoula, Giasemi, A theory of learning for the mobile age, in: The Sage Handbook of E-learning Research, Seiten 221--247, SAGE Publications Ltd, 2007
download
[URL]
Roschelle, Jeremy und Pea, Roy, A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning (2002), in: International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1:1(145--168)
download
[DOI]
[URL]
Nardi, B., Activity Theory and design, in: CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation, Seiten 529--532, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002
Peim, Nick, Activity theory and ontology (2009), in: Educational Review, 61:2(167--180)
[DOI]
Pachler, Norbert, Cook, John und Bachmair, Ben, Appropriation of ‘mobile’ cultural resources for learning (2010), in: International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning
Thorne, S., Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication (2003), in: Language Learning & Technology, 7:2(38--67)
download
[URL]

C

Lemke, Jay J., Cognition, context, and learning: a social semiotic perspective, in: Situated cognition: social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives, Seiten 37--56, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997
download
[URL]
Nardi, B., Concepts of cognition and consciousness: four voices (1996), in: Australian Journal of Information Systems, 4:1(64--79)
[URL]
Pask, G., Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education (1976), in: British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(12--25)
Martin, Deirdre und Peim, Nick, Critical perspectives on activity theory (2009), in: Educational Review, 61:2(131--138)
[DOI]

D

Engeström, Yrjoe, Developmental studies on work as a test bench of ATs, in: Understanding practice: perspectives on activity and context, Cambridge, Seiten 64--103, CUP, 1993

E


F

Zhao, Yong und Frank, Kenneth A., Factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective (2003), in: American Educational Research Journal, 40:4(807--840)
download
[URL]
Engeström, Yrjoe, From teams to knots: activity-theoretic studies of collaboration and learning at work, Cambridge University Press, (Learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspect, 2008

H

Barab, S., Human-field interaction as mediated by mobile computers, in: CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation, Seiten 533--537, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002

L


M

Hardman, J., Making sense of the meaning maker: tracking the Object of activity in a computer-based mathematics lesson using activity theory (2007), in: International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 3:4(110--130)

O

Sfard, Anna, On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one (1998), in: Educational Researcher, 27:2(4--13)
download
[DOI]

P

Laurillard, Diana, Pedagogical forms for mobile learning: framing research questions, in: Mobile learning - towards a research agenda, Seiten 151--173, WLE Centre, 2007
download
[URL]

R

Bakhurst, David, Reflections on activity theory (2009), in: Educational Review, 61:2(197--210)
[DOI]
Giddens, Anthony, Risk and responsibility (1999), in: Modern Law Review, 62:1(1--10)

S

Lave, Jean und Wenger, Etienne, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspect, 1991

T

Piaget, Jean, The construction of reality in the child, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1955
Bruce, Bertram C. und Hogan, Maureen P., The Disappearance of Technology: Toward an Ecological Model of Literacy, in: Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World, Seiten 269--281, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998
download
[URL]
Pickering, A., The mangle of practice, University of Chicago Press, 1995
Kaptelinin, Victor, The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker (2005), in: Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12:1(4--18)
[DOI]
[URL]
Kress, Gunther und Pachler, Norbert, Thinking about the 'm' in m-learning, in: Mobile learning - towards a research agenda, Seiten 7--32, WLE Centre, 2007
download
[URL]
Lemke, Jay J., Typological and topological meaning in diagnostic discourse (1999), in: Discourse Processes, 27:2(173--185)
download
[URL]

U

Rieger, Robert, Gay, Geraldine und Bennington, T., Using mobile computing to enhance field study, in: CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation, Seiten 507--542, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002
[URL]

V

Hardcastle, John, Vygotsky's Enlightenment precursors (2009), in: Educational Review, 61:2(181--195)
[DOI]

W

Winters, Niall, What is mobile learning?, in: Big Issues in Mobile Learning, Learning Sciences Research Institute, Seiten 7--11, Kaleidoscope, 2007
download
[URL]
Dourish, Paul, What we talk about when we talk about context (2004), in: Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8:1(19--30)
download
[DOI]
[URL]
Engeström, Yrjoe, Engestroem, R. und Vähäaho, T., When the center does not hold: the importance of knotworking, in: Activity Theory and social practice: cultural-historical Aapproaches, Seiten 345--374, Aarhus University Press, 1999